![]() ![]() ![]() Rufus will of course complain that it can't access the files, but, as this test validates, it is able to complete and, provided that you are using a modern distro that didn't do anything too fancy with its bootloader, the resulting USB will actually be bootable. Confirmed that Debian booted properly to the Graphical installation interface even though it wasn't able to download the files.After Rufus completed (since it did complete), tested the USB on a physical BIOS-based 圆4 machine.Run Rufus 2.17 with the ISO above (in ISO mode of course).Disconnected the network cable from the Windows 10 machine I tested with.Made sure there weren't any leftover from previous Rufus downloads, by ensuring that the rufus_files directory was deleted.Well, that's not what I am observing, which is precisely why I asked you about it.įYI, I just ran this exact test against Debian's debian-9.1.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso: It simply shows error complaining it can't connect to server and stops. Most recent Live Fedora, Debian, Parabola. If you have a custom scenario where you need a bunch of files to be available offline, I would encourage you to create your own version of Rufus that suits this need.Īgain, it FAILS for every distro I've tried. I would string encourage you to test the offline behaviour of Rufus on multiple recent distros, and confirm for yourselves whether Rufus actually fails to do its job.Īs to providing an offline download, no, that's not gonna happen as this would only be helpful for a handful of power users, and that's not the core target of what I can spend my limited time on. As a safety mechanism in case the embedded versions are incompatible with whatever version the distro chose to use.If you are using older versions of Syslinux/GRUB. ![]() It may not be obvious, but there does exist a fallback mechanism that allows Rufus to actually do its job in most cases. Have you actually tested what happens when running offline. If you use a recent Syslinux or Grub based distro, you should find that, if you run Rufus without being connected to the internet, it should actually manage to create the bootable USB as expected, even as it wasn't able to download the files (if Rufus can't download the files, it will use the embedded version, which, since SysLinux and GRUB haven't produced a release for a while, usually works just fine). I confirmed, by performing an internet search, that these values match the ones from the official image.Ĭould you consider either making a full Rufus package, including all syslinux/GRUB files from the server and Rufus executable, or maybe make an extra package with all syslinux/GRUB files only? It's very annoying when we try to run Rufus on PCs that are offline (LAN only) and Rufus fails to do its job because it can't connect or find syslinux files locally. If using an ISO image, I clicked on the # button (at the bottom of the Rufus interface), to compute the MD5, SHA1 and SHA256 checksums, which are therefore present in the log I copied.I also tried one or more of the following:.I ran a bad blocks check, by clicking the "bad blocks" check box in Rufus, and confirmed that my USB is not defective.The log I am copying is the FULL log, starting with the line Rufus version: x.y.z - I have NOT removed any part of it.I clicked the Log button in Rufus and copy/pasted the log into the line that says below.I performed a search in the issue tracker for similar issues, using keywords relevant to my problem.I looked at to see if my question has already been answered.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |